 |
Traces left by Avar
People in Europe |
-
However, it has been observed that the Avar
influence kept going in Europe. The traces of their mementoes include the title of
"Ban" that was one of the highest military-governmental titles among the
Croatian people (Baga in Gok-Turk language and Bagan in Avar language that was present
among the Bulgarians and Hungarians) and the titles such as Boyar and Yugruş, etc. and
and the name of the cities such as Navarino in Greece (=Pylos, with the original form of
Avarino), and Antivari in Albania (=Br, with its ancient form of Civitas Avarorum).
Furthermore, the archaeological works pertaining to the Avar period that were excavated in
Hungary (the cast tools and horse harnesses with the animal fight descriptions upon these
materials) are accepted as the examples of the Turkish art in Europe (animal style) that
originally developed in the Central Asia and the traces of this style can also be observed
in France in the period of Movergin family.
-
- The Protsotvats
golden treasury in Albania pertains to Avar people. Additionally, the archaeological
researches have also displayed the influence of Avar Turkish art over the Germanic and
Slavic arts. A treasure composed of 23 units of golden pots with Turkish inscriptions on
them was found in the site of Nagy Szent in the Central Hungary in the year of 1799 and
the question about the Turkish tribe to which this treasure belonged is a still debated
issue. However, it has been alleged that this famous treasure belonged to the period of
Avar people.
-
- As a consequence;
the domination of Avar people in Europe for more than two centuries is of great
significance for several reasons in respect of the European history. First of all, the
Slavic tribes had lived under the long-term Turkish domination for the first time and they
found the opportunity to advance from the stage of "tribal" life to the stage of
state organisation due to the influence of Turkish state and military organisations.
Secondly, the Turks had much more blended with various Germanic (Frank) groups. This
relation has been mostly composed of reciprocal struggles; however, both tribes were
forced to resolve a state of modus vivendi in the capacity of neighbouring groups.
|
|